Portfolio Workshop
Meeting
October 8, 2002
Officers in Attendance: Lisa Gaume Jones, Jen Bowen, Jamie Weicken, Vicki Morris,Amy Moran, Ronie McBride, April Brown and Mary Combs.
Advisors in Attendance: Dr. Kathy Lofflin, Dr. Ann Wentz and Professor Betty Bennett facilitators. Dr. Judith Shabaya observing.
Overall Attendance: 23 students and 4 faculty.
The meeting began at 6:30pm in Copley 300. Dr. Lofflin began the workshop by telling students what it was she liked to see in a portfolio. She handed out the materials below as a guideline for writing reflection papers and a copy of the Missouri Standards for Pre-service Teachers that students are to be addressing when collecting their artifacts for the portfolio.
PORTFOLIO REQUIREMENTS
Education Department
Park University
Effective Fall 1999
Revised Summer 2000, Fall 2000, Spring 2002
Each student in an Education program leading to certification must produce and maintain a process portfolio throughout his/her matriculation at Park University. The concept will be introduced in ED 105 Career Inquiry in Education. The pre-service teacher will be expected to begin the portfolio based on the following standards and requirements. It is recommended that pre-service teachers use a 3 or 4 inch three ring notebook in a subdued color, blue, black or maroon. A school logo on the cover and the pre-service student's name is acceptable, otherwise the cover should be unadorned. Your advisor will also advise you on the portfolio, although much work will be done in various courses. Some advisors prefer you not imbed your work in plastic. Check with you advisor on this. Remember, we need easy access to your work.
At the time of application for admission to the department the pre-service teacher must present a portfolio that demonstrates his/her progress to that point. The assumption is that a major part of general education will be complete, the pre-service teacher will have completed all education foundations courses (100 & 200 level courses at least) and have substantial evidence of progress in his/her major or area of concentration. At this point the portfolio will be reviewed by the advisor ( and other department members at the advisor's request) to determine the progress of the pre-service student. Admission to the department will be denied if the portfolio does not represent adequate progress toward professional development.
The portfolio should address all Missouri Standards the student has studied to that point in time. Reflection pieces should be started and artifacts collected representing progress thus far, including content work and general education At this time the portfolio should demonstrate the student's understanding of the standards, the portfolio process, and the ability to put it together in a professional manner. It will not be complete yet, but the portfolio should demonstrate a good beginning. Your advisor has a form to fill out and send to the Director of Education verifying you have an acceptable portfolio begun at this time.
Each of the ten standards should be addressed by a reflective piece. The reflective piece should explain how the pre-service teacher understands the standard, how and where you learned it, and what you will do with this information, skill disposition in the classroom. Artifacts should support your statements. Artifacts should be in a separate section, identified by number or letter so they may be referred to in more than one standard. The idea is to use one artifact to demonstrate several standards. A few good artifacts are better than many weak ones.
The pre-service teacher must include artifacts that represent mastery of each standard and competency. The reflective piece should explain how the artifact demonstrates the standard. Some discretion is left to the pre-service teacher in selection of the artifacts, but in some cases a course will have specific artifacts designated for the portfolio. Transfer pre-service teachers should meet with their advisor early in their matriculation at Park to determine what artifacts they have that will be appropriate.
These artifacts will take many different forms: journals, tests with professor's comments, papers, lesson plans, videos of actual teaching, or tutoring logs. The rubric, if any, by which the work was evaluated should be included along with the pre-service teacher's reflective piece explaining why this artifact demonstrates a particular competency or standard. Artifacts may change as you progress and gain mastery of your field and improve your ability to teach. An artifact may demonstrate more than one standard so we recommend placing them in the back and number or letter code them so you can refer to them in several reflective pieces.
During the ED 359 Strategies and Practicum (Early Childhood ED 328) the portfolio will play a substantial role in completion of the course. Considerable progress should be made in developing the portfolio, adding portions that demonstrate knowledge and skills developed at that point of education. This is where application becomes evident in the portfolio.
The portfolio may be used in causes other than those identified here. Certainly work from all courses will comprise the content of the portfolio. Each professor will help the pre- service teacher identify those assignments in his/her class that might address standards. The goal of the portfolio is to demonstrate your development as a teacher. By the end of matriculation the portfolio should demonstrate growth and accomplishments and supply the pre-service teacher with items to use in his/her first professional portfolio.
Certainly one purpose of the portfolio is to allow the student to demonstrate that he/she is prepared to enter the classroom. Pedagogical skill and knowledge is important, but your content knowledge and general education is important also. Student mastery of these win be demonstrated in 1. 1. The portfolio should be a picture of what the student knows, understands, believes, and can do as a teacher.
Final evaluation of the portfolio will be at the conclusion of the Seminar portion of Directed Teaching (ED 409, 411, 412, 413, 414). After student teaching the portfolio should be complete. A grade for this course will not be recorded until an acceptable portfolio is received, which may delay graduation and application for certification. An acceptable portfolio is important.
The portfolio will be evaluated by a team of Education Department faculty appointed by the Director. The portfolio will be due one week after completion of directed teaching to allow time for evaluation and revision if necessary.
PORTFOLIO CONTENTS
Table of Contents
Part A: Personal history and background-usually written for student teaching application application
Developmental Philosophy of Education--initially written in ED 210 School as a Social System and then written again later in the program.
Admissions criteria for department-include a copy of C-Base scores-copy your blue form or type up a page explaining the admissions criteria.
Letter of acceptance to department.
Part B: Performance Standards-address each of the ten standards with a reflective piece that demonstrates how you accomplished the standard. Use artifacts to support your statements. Be thoughtful about each standard you address and each artifact you select. Explain how and why the artifact demonstrates your mastery of the standard and how this will help you in the classroom. Explain how you think it has helped you acquire the necessary knowledge, skills or dispositions to be a teacher and how you believe it will help you in the future. This section is the heart of the portfolio, no more important than the other sections. The artifact section should be coded for easy reference.
Attached you will find a copy of the Missouri Standards for Teacher Education. The standard is in bold print. The performance Indicators are guides to help you know the kind of thing you need to demonstrate you know or can do.
Part C: Clinical Experiences
Description of each field experience
Developmental nature of experiences--demonstrates how you grew into a teacher.
Copies of lesson plans and reflection on what the children learned, how you knew, and what needs revision next time should be included. Lesson plans should include how you adapted the lesson for special needs.
Feedback from professional--cooperating teacher's and supervisor's assessments.
Part D: Final assessment for licensure
Praxis results--professional licensure exam
Evidence of professional preparation and competence--copy of transcripts demonstrating coursework, conferences attended, membership in SNEA.
Part E: Artifacts
Select artifacts that demonstrate your readiness to be a teacher. Each may demonstrate more than one standard. Each must be coded so you may refer to it in your reflective pieces. Reflective pieces are critical. Each piece must demonstrate that you do teacher thinking-, critically creatively, and regularly.
Missouri Standards for Teacher Education Programs
(MoSTEP)
Category I. Design of Professional Education
Standard 1: Performance Standards for Education Professionals
The unit ensures that candidates possess the knowledge, skills and competencies defined as appropriate to their area of responsibility.
1.1 General Studies for Initial Teacher Preparation (Initial)
The unit ensures that candidates for teacher certification have completed general studies courses and experiences in the liberal arts and sciences.
Quality Indicators:
1.1.1 The general studies include the arts, communications, history, literature,
mathematics, philosophy, sciences and the social sciences.
1.1.2 The general studies incorporate multi-cultural and global perspectives.
1.2 Content, Professional, Pedagogical, and Integrative Studies for Teacher Preparation (Initial)
The unit ensures that candidates for teacher certification have completed a program of content, professional, pedagogical and integrative studies.
Quality Indicators
1.2.1 The pre-service teacher understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry and structures of the discipline(s) within the context of a global society and creates learning experiences that make these aspects of the subject matter meaningful for students.
Performance Indicators: The pre-service teacher
1.2.1.1 knows the subject(s) applicable to the area(s) of certification or endorsement (defined by Subject Specific Competencies for Beginning Teachers in Missouri)
1.2.1.2 presents the subject(s) in multiple ways;
1.2.1.3 uses studnets' prior knowledge;
1.2.1.4 engages students in the methods of inquiry used in the subject(s);
1.2.1.5 creates interdisciplinary learning.
1.2.2 The pre-service teacher understands how students learn and develop, and provides learning opportunities that support the intellectual, social, and personal development of all students.
Performance Indicators: The pre-service teacher
1.2.2.1 knows and identifies child/adolescent development;
1.2.2.2 strengthens prior knowledge with new ideas;
1.2.2.3 encourages student responsibility;
1.2.2.4 knows theories of learning.
1.2.3 The pre-service teacher understands how students differ in their approaches to learning and creates instructional opportunities that are adapted to diverse learners.
Performance Indicators: The pre-service teacher
1.2.3.1 identifies prior experience, learning styles, strengths, and needs;
1.2.3.2 designs and implements individualized instruction based on prior experience, learning styles, strengths, and needs;
1.2.3.3 knows when and how to access specialized services to meets students' needs;
1.2.3.4 connects instruction to students' prior experiences and family, culture and community.
1.2.4 The pre-service teacher recognizes the importance of long-range planning and curriculum development and develops, implements and evaluates curriculum based upon student, district and state performance standards.
Performance Indicators: The pre-service teacher
1.2.4.1 selects and creates learning experiences that are appropriate for curriculum goals, relevant to learners, and based upon principles of effective instruction (e.g., encourages exploration and problem solving, building new skills from those previously acquired);
1.2.4.2 creates lessons and activities that recognize individual needs of diverse learners and variations in learning styles and performance;
1.2.4.3 evaluates plans relative to long and short-term goals and adjusts them to meet student needs and to enhance learning.
1.2.5 The pre-service teacher uses a variety of instructional strategies to encourage students' development of critical thinking, problem solving, and performance skills.
Performance Indicators: The pre-service teacher
1.2.5.1 selects alternative teaching strategies, materials, and technology to achieve multiple instructional purposes to meet students needs;
1.2.5.2 engages students in active learning that promotes the development of critical thinking, problem solving, and performance capabilities.
1.2.6 The pre-service teacher uses an understanding of individual and group motivation and behavior to create a learning environment that encourages positive social interaction, active engagement in learning, and self-motivation.
Performance Indicator: The pre-service teacher
1.2.6.1 knows motivation theories and behavior management strategies and techniques;
1.2.6.2 manages time, space, transitions and activities effectively;
1.2.6.3 engages students in decision making.
1.2.7 The pre-service teacher models effective verbal, nonverbal, and media communication techniques to foster active inquiry, collaboration, and supportive interaction in the classroom.
Performance Indicators: The pre-service teacher
1.2.7.1 models effective verbal /non-verbal communication skills
1.2.7.2 demonstrates sensitivity to cultural, gender, intellectual, and physical ability differences in classroom communication and in responses to students' communications;
1.2.7.3 supports and expands learner expression in speaking, writing, listening, and other media;
1.2.7.4 uses a variety of media communication tools.
1.2.8 The pre-service teacher understands and uses formal and informal assessment strategies to evaluate and ensure the continuous intellectual, social, and physical development of the learner.
Performance Indicators: The pre-service teacher
1.2.8.1 employs a variety of formal and informal assessment techniques (e.g. observation, portfolios of student work, teacher made tests, performance tasks, projects, student self-assessments, authentic assessments, and standardized tests) to enhance and monitor her or his knowledge of learning to evaluate student progress and performances, and to modify instructional approaches and learning strategies;
1.2.8.2 uses assessment strategies to involve learners in self-assessment activities, to help them become aware of their learning behaviors, strengths, needs and progress and to encourage them to set personal goals for learning;
1.2.8.3 evaluates the effect of class activities on both individual and the class as a whole collecting information through observation of classroom interactions, questioning and analysis of student work;
1.2.8.4 maintains useful records of student work and performances and can communicate student progress knowledgeably and responsibly, based on appropriate indicators, to student, parents, and other colleagues.
1.2.9 The pre-service teacher is a reflective practitioner who continually assess the effects of choices and actions on others. This reflective practitioner actively seeks out opportunities to grow professionally and utilizes the assessment and professional growth to generate more learning for students.
Performance Indicators: The pre-service teacher
1.2.9.1 applies a variety of self-assessment and problem-solving strategies for reflecting on practices, their influences on students' growth and learning, and the complex interactions between them;
1.2.9.2 uses resources available for professional development.
1.2.9.3 practices professional ethical standards.
1.2.10 The pre-service teacher fosters relationships with school colleagues, parents, and educational partners in the larger community to support student learning and well-being.
Performance Indicators:
1.2.10.1 participates in collegial activities designed to make the entire school a productive learning environment.
1.2.10.2 talks with and listens to students, is sensitive and responsive to signs of distress, and seeks appropriate help as needed to solve students' problems;
1.2.10.3 seeks opportunities to develop relationships with parents and guardians of students, and seeks to develop cooperative partnerships in support of student learning and well-being;
1.2.10.4 identifies and uses appropriate school personnel and community resources to help students reach their full potential.
Writing Reflective Pieces
1. First, type our each standard completely. Include all quality Indicators and Performance Indicators. (Can be checked out on 3.5 disk from SNEA office)
2. Describe what the standard means in your own words.
3. Explain why you think that standard is important for you as a developing teacher. This may blend with your description in #2 above.
4. Describe how you believe you have grown and developed toward that standard so far in your teacher education program. Be specific here, citing courses, activities, assignments, experiences, etc. that facilitated your development. This can include both experiences you do have artifacts for and experiences which influenced your development but may not have resulted in a particular artifact. Try to trace your learning on each standard up to this point.
5. Explain how you are demonstrating your competence in relationship to the standard. Here is where you discuss specific artifacts and how and why they meet that particular standard.
Some hints about artifacts:
An artifact can demonstrate more than one standard. For example, an elaborate instructional unit may demonstrate several. Address the particular aspects of the artifact that demonstrate particular standards within each of the reflective statements that it works for. But if you have plenty of artifacts (you should have been saving everything) you can then focus on a few standards that each artifact demonstrates best.
Be sure to give each artifact a name and refer to it consistently by that name. That way if you refer to the same artifact in several different reflective pieces it is always easy to find.
Compile your artifacts in a separate section after the other parts of the portfolio. Then you can just refer the reader to the artifact as many times as needed and you don't have to make multiple copies of any artifacts. if your naming system is consistent, it should work fine.
It may seem redundant, but it can really help to provide some sort of label for each artifact, just to confirm that the reader has indeed found what he/she was looking for. And if your artifact isn't abundantly self-evident, please include a very brief "caption" or explanation of what the thing is and what it does. For example, a clearly labeled instructional unit probably doesn't need a label (though a labeled tab and even a title page would help). But pictures of you working with students on a project probably needs some captions or an explanation. Don't just simply "plunk" things down unexplained. If in doubt, do more than you think you need to.
Artifacts are supposed to be your own work. Don't just put in things that are course handouts, articles, or anything else that you did not create without doing some work yourself. If you do have something like that, it must be accompanied by a detailed reflective piece describing what you learned and how this helped you develop. then the reflective piece becomes the artifact. Never put in a lengthy piece that is someone else's work (such as a full-length article), even if you do a reflective piece. For an article that was meaningful to you, for example, simply include the citation. The readers are more interested in what you got form the article than in the article itself. Similarly, if you went to a conference and wan to use it for an artifact (it would fit for part of 1.2.9), spend time reflecting on what you learned. You might attach a brief copy of the conference program, or maybe a certificate of attendance if those are given out (get one if possible) but nothing too big.
Include with artifacts any evaluations or comments you got from instructors. It also can be good to include rough drafts, particularly if you then reflect about how you revised the drafts to make something better. That really shows growth, self-evaluation, and the ability to use constructive criticism.
Including samples of children's work (or copies of those) always strengthens an artifact and a portfolio. Do be sure that you have the child's permission, and do blot out the child's name so that his/her privacy is protected (you can indicate the age and sex of the child somewhere on the page).
These were the main ideas conveyed at the workshop.
If you would like more information please contact me at gaumejones@aol.com .
If you missed this workshop look for another portfolio workshop to be held in the spring semester!!
Check the Upcoming Events page for more info!